>>13103777Thanks for posting the link anon. It explains about the NDA, like people were saying above. It’s not trying to screw her out of the money, it’s that new law that invalidates NDA’s that would cover up certain sex stuff. Even if she hasn’t received the judgment yet her legal team probably feels comfortable enough that the NDA is going to get tossed that she leaked some of the details, specifically the ones relating to why the NDA shouldn’t be valid in the first place. If the judgment comes expect tons more shit to come out.