>>13507001>>13507043I know, right? Crazy. You see a thread of actual criticism of an incompetent, elderly man who makes his own fanzine while knowing literally nothing about the subjects he covers, claiming to be a journalist while observably failed at every aspect of basic journalism.
And then there are always weird schizos seething with random, perennially online buzzwords and cope who are unable to dispute the observable fact that the wrestling observer is unreadable and full of misinformation and the main talking point of the whole thing is Dave's random star ratings that are based on nothing but how many spots he saw during the periods that he paid attention to the matches - completely removed from any context or narrative that would be essential when reviewing a wrestling match if you had a brain.
But marks get so weirdly defensive about this weird old man who publicly reports blatant lies regularly, can't answer any questions about his own process, can't clean a room without needing 2 more adult men to come do it for him, doesn't know that burritos are mexican and can't write even one coherent sentence despite claiming to be a professional journalist and bragging about how superior he is to his contemporaries, often immediately after reporting a blatant lie.
He's funny to listen to but anyone who actually thinks that Dave knows anything about wrestling is fucking retarded.
