>>13649274But the thing is you don't like pro wrestling, you like the WWE goyslop "sports entertainment" or whatever the hell that is. The overly long, dramatic Bollywood-tier shots and acting. This is not wrestling and never was. This was Vince autism and Vince was considered nothing more than a delirious carny by the old timers. Actual wrestling would be something from 90s AJPW or NJPW. Or 80's NWA. That's wrestling - guys beating each other up and the moves looking like they hurt.
What you seem to want is these le epic cinema shots of Irish whip, followed by ddt, followed by laying on the ground for 10 minutes, followed by a bodyslam followed by another laying on the ground for another 10 minutes, followed by the most sloppy looking finisher in existence to the most overly melodramatic acting you can see, 1-2-3, over.
Where is the fun in any of that? People watch wrestling for the spectacle. Because wrestling, done correctly, can be far more impactful, devastating and fast paced than MMA. If I wanted to watch a snail-like wrestling match, i'd just watch the UFC prelims. Why would I waste my time with the fake, equally boring and less impactful, shit?
>>13649313>your smarter WWE fanTKO didn't spend anything to acquire WWE because they wouldn't even have that money in the first place. WWE and Endeavor merged into the same company. You don't know shit about real and fake fighting, but apparently you don't seem to know what the fuck is going on in the company that you are such am ark for.
