>>13839463Firstly you put the quotations in "hate the "artistry"" in the wrong place and misrepresent what I write like a sillybilly. Specifically says there I can recognize the skill. It's extremely annoying to have to reiterate 3 posts back for some things but having you pick your own interpretations without reading the same line you quote is not worth my time either beyond this.
Reiterating now for clarity that the in-ring skin, while a requirement for any wrestling to be good, is alone not enough to make for a good match because it's
>Missing the point of wrestling as 'endedaimend' and business if nobody is there to watch or only future generations digging up the archives is worthy and big brained enough to appreciate as genius type of starving artist - appreciation through time mentalityand at worst
> Schrödinger's cat wrestling of two bums fighting in cardboard box that without looking in the box it might be the greatest match of all time or they might just lay there dead. Secondly AEW is equally if not more superhero wrestling, as shown in vids in this thread, so pulling out that acting and "serious" acting comparison from Downey of all people without actual context or tone of the quote against WWE style is pretty attempt sad. To take this off from some humorous acceptance speech without the full context to back some claim that technical work should be more valued than sales is asinine. Nolans movies aren't struggling in terms of money in production and marketing put into selling the 3 hour boring dog shit to the audience, especially after how badly Tenet sold. This ties to first point that you miss use quotes, as badly as the guy who made the tweet in the picture, is this your tweet? Stop, please.
Of that side note: Bafta's is the britbong wrestling tube equivalent of movie opinions, Oscars are a unionized pat-on-the-back-competition, kinda like certain other industry eh?
