>>13972903Stock market valuation≠cultural footprint
Ford's shares are worth less than Tesla's, but there are more Fords on the road than Teslas. Just like WWE is in more homes than AEW.
There's something interesting wedged in your analogy. AEW should be Tesla (hot, young challenger brand), and WWE should be Ford (iconic heritage brand). Tesla's valued as high as it is on the stock market because of innovation+retarded carnie ceo drumming up hype, therefore business and investors+vertically-integrated production process.
Looking at the Tesla playbook, what is it that Tony is failing to bring to the table in order to propel AEW to the next level? Assuming that AEWs shares would be worth less than WWEs, of course.
