>>14308610As I said, "in the recent PG years." The Attitude Era was another matter.
>Also didn't they have mixed tag teams before? Granted those you basically got around any problems because the guys would just let the women tag outThat's actually REQUIRED in "mixed tag," as opposed to "intergender tag" matches. Once one woman tags in, the woman on the opposing team becomes legal for her side, even if her male partner doesn't actually tag out. Likewise, if a man tags in for his side, the opposing woman is no longer legal.
AFAIK, the only promotion with TV deal doing actual intergender matches billed as such is TNA. AEW doesn't do them (other than the Nyla issue); supposedly WBD won't allow it. There was one such match (Kenny Omega and Riho vs Kip Sabian and Penelope Ford) on the Jericho Cruise back in early 2020, but it was never planned to be on TV (they did ultimately show the tape on Dynamite by popular demand, but had to clear it specially with WBD first).
Again, most state commissions don't care, so it's really only an issue in a handful of markets. Maryland threw a hissy fit about the "unsanctioned" match at Full Gear 2019, and now Oklahoma is issuing a warning in this case. Given that all that came of the Maryland thing in the end was a measly $10,000 fine, it's not likely to prove that big of a problem. At most, they'll just have to consider what they book for what state, just like WWF had to do back in the day: the Pennsylvania state commission apparently didn't care about "Hervina," but if the match had been somewhere in the South, it might have been a different story.
