>>5847452>is that the lord of light version of the b. primrose ?Yes, but also no. That would be like saying that the symbols associated with Gnostic Christianity are Christian symbols. Technically correct, but also not correct.
>>5847530>I don't know if you know this, anon, but the QM Just LOVES Lady Knights.This is true.
>>5847534>Damn I should've dropped my vote for hand to reduce the contamination.<span class="mu-i">No that would have made it worse</span>. For me. Hand was probably the only one that could blend in a way that made any sense, and extending it to breast wasn't that difficult. Without hand, the entire blend falls apart.
>>5847563This is not a mark of the Dark One, exactly. It definitely falls into his domain, but is ultimately a reflection of the one who bears it.
>>5847693>I think adding the eye along with hand and breast is excessive. We shouldn't look like a battered housewife.The bandages are a temporary solution. You'll be getting a more permanent seal upon them when you return to civilized lands.
>>5847695>Certainly feels like a curse this way. We're sexy fantasy giantess Two-Face.There isn't really any scarring or such on your face, though. Your eye was obliterated/mutated by the dark powers the lance injected into you. So basically, you gained what every Chuuni dreams of having, a cursed eye whose dark powers need to be sealed away.
>>5847699Kind of, but not really? If you went with the vines and flowers, it would be more "flower" close to the breast and less "vine". The wyrms (chinese style dragons) would have their tails curling around a certain interesting part of Louise's anatomy. The chains would loop together there, and the tongues of flame would come to a "point".
The mark would be roughly as dense as a yakuza-style sleeve tattoo would be. For the approximate area of the "cup", see pic related (the flower and vine would be similar to pic related, but the vines would be black and thorny, and with the steely/electric blue of the flower on your cursed eye).
