>>10112998You said if the art is created doing something horrible it should still be fine. If a guy makes a painting with the blood of a toddler he murdered, that's a nono. If it's a harmless thing created but the artist is a bad person who did bad things outside of the art, that's different. That is where we disagree. You alledgedly support the former, I don't. I'm not going to have some retard screengrab my post about why hating the Takua64 guy is reprehensible and have you put words in my mouth to make my point seem like it's coming from an unsound position.
