>>9347726>in the 90s they were telling us fossils were pure rock, all the material replaced (which makes that whole dating thing even dumber) so a DNA scanner wouldn't find shit, let alone fuse it with something else it scannedWait, then what did the scanners scan? Or was Mainframe working with a theory contrary to the accepted view at the time?
>more recently they're saying the opposite, they have dinosaur bones with marrow still in 'em. fuck we just dug up a basically intact ankylosaurid. so it's throwing all kinds of shit out.Bone marrow? The hell? I don't know man, I was big into dinos but I can't keep up anymore. Brontos actually aren't real dinos but now they are again, that was already an emotional roller coaster, I don't know how much more of that I can handle.
>>9347709Whereas if you respond to his post like this
>9347709he often misses it completely
