>>11247478It's likely a troll thread because they got butthurt by a comment in another thread, hence contrarian posts like
>>11246211 that deny the reality in most of the pictures and create brand new goalposts instead of admitting they're full of shit.
>>11246356>We can tell you haven't bought a toy incat least 4 years.I own more toys than you, hence knowing how bad toys have gotten. You know I own more toys than you and are likely jealous of it, hence you needing to pretend every photograph I've taken is fake and gay.
>>11246372>Sorry. I realised that with my last comment I posted a cheap army builder versionI was gonna say... but even your new image shows the lack of detail in paint. All those unpainted rivets. The lack of weathering. Compare that to
>>11246121, where all strings braiding the armor are painted. There's AT LEAST 3x more painted details on the samurai than on your dinosuarman.
Look at Conan in
>>11246093 . All the little studs on the leather strips are painted. There's probably a hundred individual studs that have been painted. You can't spray mask that like the snakes on your dinosaur man. Look at the little gold accents on the silver embellishments on Conan's belt. Hand painted details, individually applied, instead of being given a quick once over and it looks amazing because of that level of detail.
IT's paint apps on paint apps on paint apps. At least 5 different types of paint apps too.
What you posted has two or three layers of just spray masks.
Even in the late 00s and early 00s, McFarlane's Halo line, where McFarlane did budget cuts to the paint apps to give their figures 30+PoA, still looks better than the vast majority of toylines today. Only $8 when they were brand new, when action figures were reaching $12. That Brute in the background easily outdoes Joytoy's WH40k line and he's not even that complexly painted compared to other Brutes and Elites.
