>>10997753Ok, well, interesting tangent (genuinely), and I get what you were trying to prove with that question, but do you not see the flaw in such a thing? Your trying to one up that other guy with no true scottsman, but the problem with no true scottsman is that there gets a point where what qualifies as a true scottsman, or what matters more in such a contest, becomes subjective, and is therefore unquantifiable. There are some levels where you can sort of prove "trueness", such as me posting a wide variety of painted minis, in such a quantity that is nothing to scoff at, with timestamps to prove that they are indeed mine, vs subby and his two pictures that he reuses for years, along with his endless array of googled images that he presents, not understanding their context. Like, I do in fact win the no true scottsman there, but I never invoked it, because it is a flawed line of reasoning. It's stupid to invoke it, but even stupider to do so, and fail at it so badly.
All of that to say, I agree with your sentiment, that we should be focused on posting Warhammer action figures, but You've lost my sympathies with your ranting against "secondary", especially when you do so to people that use it reactively. Additionally, why do you hate the term, when it wasn't even directed at you? I know later that other guy did, but again, that was reactively. It makes no sense to complain about the phrase the way you do, unless you are the "secondary" in question (aka subby, aka the mentally ill). I'm trying to be reasonable here, will you reply in kind?
