>>9334101>That webm is so well sized and smooth.>If you or someone tells me the secrets of perfect webm makingI made that years ago. I have no idea what i'm doing with computers.
I basically did what this guy said
>>9333761I think my video being very short helps, what settings I used and what site I used I don't remember. Not sure I even fiddled with codecs so you sound like you're better on track than I was.
I did do a few takes where I didn't move my hand or the feature too fast as it would reveal the shitty fps making it look choppy like in this one. Keeping the actual motions you record slow and smooth is key.
