>>10798004>u didnt address the ponit!Way to prove you're a retard, retard. Someone who isn't retarded would be able to use his average brain to realize everything was refuted without meme arrows appearing. But since you're a retard, i guess i have to spell everything out.
>Something that seemed great 10 years ago might not hold up to a figure of the same character released today.LOL. We're in the dark ages right now. Budgets have been getting cut since 2008 and only a few features have been brought back since. Modern articulation and sculpting has already been in use since the early 00s, and we had better paint back then. So these 10 year old figures that you're saying don't hold up, guess what? EVERYONE who isn't a fanboy knew they were shit back then. Take pic for instance: Look at that non-human proportions on the figure on the left. It's obvious to anyone with eyes it was poorly sculpted when it first came out. The fact the new one is better sculpt is just the fact that Bandai used a better sculptor. Nothing else, because we've already seen hundreds of toy companies produce human looking toys for decades before.
Again, this is a problem with YOUR standards being awfully low ten years ago.
>Or no one should've bought early Dragon Ball Figuarts because the 2.0If they were flawed, with bad sculpts, >again< DONT BUY SHIT. I know I'm staying away from modern Dragon Ball figures because the new engineering looks like shit and isn't even better anyway
I'd rather have NOTHING than a heavily flawed figure.
Again, it's hard for you to understand since you're a retard who fills his room with trash because you shouldn't be trusted with money, but most everyone else is able to stop themselves from buying shit and can live just fine without Flavor of the Month #5033 because it was poorly sculpted or has ugly engineering. If nothing good is ever created, then oh well! They're just toys.
>But i NEED to consume!Please wander through a street without your handler, retard.
