>>7331258>Right now i enjoy building cute girl things like danceschools and girly bathrooms and cute kitchensThis is just godawful. Good for you...i guess? It's good if you are 30+ y/o dad and now you just "settled down" as a person and just need a house where you spend your last days - this what controling your imagination right now.
Younger and imaginative people would never focus on such domestic andbasic stuff or have it as a minor background thing (i do have a small kitchen in one of my MOC's but just as a joke - it has a human skull in a microwave)
Most of men tend to go further and further explore new things and experiment with stuff.
NOT TO MENTION ---> "girl things" is not a good thing at first place.
Don't forget that female-based toys is an outdated (inb4 blah blah sjw) thing. Completely dumbed down boring and a thing that a smart person will not have as a main playstile.
Pink female based toys were made mostly in USA back in the middle of 1900s and they stayed the same while boys toys kept evolving further and further.
While girl sets BARELY evolved even in lego form.
Girls still do stupid things in toy sets - being house cleaners and dancers (dancing is not bad but it sucks as a toy-ish playstile there is not that much you can do in a fucking dance school playset).
It's cool when a girl evolves with time and likes boys things and cool gadgets.
But a boy de-evolving and being interested in stupid boring outdated things? Wew...no thanks.
And im gay - i loved fashion as a kid (basically i loved stupid girl things) however the boy part of me also made me super interested in mechs and monsters. And part of why i love lego is i can do quick designs of characters (clothes' hairstyles beards and trousers and weapons) and collect cute animal minifigures (feminine side i suppose).
A smart man will use femine side to complete his world but he will never "go back" to the place current females running from.
