>>11251693>making up a definition because he needs to arguethis is insanity
>>11251810Brah, there's a world of difference between
>these Mythic Legion/Joytoy's Warhammer figures break because they're poorly madeand
>Everything you like is shit! Your low resolution images prove there's dust sized specks of flaws everywhere! Look at these images of broken 90s toys! They prove you're wrong to like toys that were made in the 00s! I'm going to move my goalposts everytime you prove my old one wrong, because you're a bad person that disagreed with me!From the Cambridge dictionary
>to have a strong personal opinion about something that you want people to accept and that is the reason why you do somethingSo i literally can't have an axe to grind, because it's not my personal opinion that Mythic Legion figures are fragile pieces of shit. It's a fact that 4H uses brittle plastics. Nevermind i didn't even bring these lines up first. Some other guy did and i only stated how they're able to use more paints than other lines, and that's because they cheap out on the quality of their plastics. Despite their higher prices, they need to cut the budget elsewhere to not even reach the 00s golden age of paint apps level.
It's also not my opinion that McFarlane Toys was copied by the toy industry, because the toy industry changed overnight to making their toys more detailed and dynamic than ever. They also increased the scale of toys and started including more paint apps
>ib4 comparing models to toysAgain, shows the ignorance of the people trying to bring this up. They use different, much cheaper processes (including low pressure injection molding). Since they use softer plastics, they didn't need to use high pressure injection molding. As mentioned many posts ago, companies like Games Workshop started using it for their models and is one of the reasons they justify the high cost of their models. Bandai started uses them too, hence the shift in quality of their kits (late 90s?)
