>>8920337I get that they were going for something other than "cgi cartoon", and I appreciate texture to an extent... but this is some near-uncanny-valley levels of "your beloved fren from 90s cgi television" mixed with "animal planet biology and anatomy". Blackarachnia's hard to do, sure. But could you imagine Tarantulas but with nature-accuracy..? Hm.
>toy/cartoon accuracy debates vs nature/nurture debatesHm..
