>>5836676>>5836723>from pictures I've seen looks like they were designed this way.Wow.
You keep offering up these little homilies, and every time you're wrong.
Of course they aren't designed this way. It's a flaw from the factory. Clover had the problem with the joint not going in all the way in the bottom piece, so the easy fix from Daibadi was to trim, or sand the bottom peg so the joint, and thus the "cup" part of the torso would fit snugly against the bottom piece.
See pic.
Same with Shamrock. In some cases it's the top peg of the joint. Either way the ifx is the same.
>I'm not fortunate to own one of the originals but So really you shouldn't be offering advice that's nothing more than conjecture, and incorrect most of the time at that.
'course what do you expect from a namefag? Gotta get that recognition, even at a board that's based on people remaining anonymous.
