>>6911946>is it 5%? because it's -5% in their revenue growth over last and what was TRU hoping for this year?You be an awful bookkeeper because 5% of Hasbro's brand does not equal 5%of Toys R Us revenue growth. You are trying so hard to find a way you could be right you are not even comprehending what is being written. You are rewriting in your mind what the post said. That or you are very stupid.
>You're comparing apples to oranges. in deep irony that's what you did with anons post about the 5%.
>retail store ≠ producer of content.That's agreeing with me that Star Wars being a better seller wouldn't improve the chances of a buyer. You just said what I posted.
>They obviously don't care for that type of debt thoughSo again you agree Star Wars has shit to do with that.
> but again, one more year is another year to do somethingThey would not have gotten that with Star War sales alone, that's all I said and you have agreed with me.
