>>10724844>get into argument>get proven wrong>WELL YOU DONT LIKE TOYS!I like toys, but i feel like more expensive toys should try harder than children's budget toys. Isn't the point of paying more is to get higher quality products?
>>10724851I was specifically talking about Space Marines being 1/20 scale, since we were talking about the Custodians (ib4 anal nitpicking tehy're technically not the same type of space marines)
The Tau are 1:16.
Only the humans (the nuns and storm troopers) were in 1:18, but the upcoming imperial army guys are differently proportioned and they appear out of scale now. Pretty shit that they changed the style for the humans right in the middle of the toyline.
Anyway, the point of that photo is to show that the Star Wars line is shorter than 1:18 scale.
Joytoy is literally worse at putting attention to detail than fucking Hasbro and their budget children's toyline, since most of their SW scale with one another. Whereas Joytoy is as random as McFarlane.
Here's another photo of how a 7' tall Space Marine is as tall as a Space Marine that should be standing 8" tall, but from a slightly different angle, since i took multiple photos of my toys to pick the best example. Note the 3.75" scale figure that is almost as tall as the space marine, despite the fact the height difference should be about 2 heads taller if the Space Marine were 1:18.
Also, take note of the Brute in the back, who is more in scale with 1:18 toys than Joytoy's are. Only cost 3 bucks more than a GI Joe back then and has way nicer paint apps than Joytoy's stuff, AND their figures scaled with one another (until the reach line, but that's okay, since all the reach figures scaled with one another, unlike Joytoy).
>>10724852>all photos he's posted of his toys are fake cause this is my defense mechanismsure is shit sandwich lover who's angry anyone points out it's made of shit.
