>>10730371WH40k minis have no scale and GW has said numerous times, every single year, in their magazines and events, that their minis only represent the ideas and roles to play the game they created. Proportions are exaggerated in order to make the character and weapons more noticeable, not because that's what they actuallly look like.
>I thought the stance on all this lore shit inconsistencyOnly exists to facilate the gaming end, since people have their own factions they created 3 decades ago that don't exist in any rule books and oldass minis that are long out of production.
What you're saying about how everything is inconsistent is said with a nudge and a wink, which their magazines and webseries have to spell out about a dozen times a year, because there's a lot of asspies who don't understand what a wink conveys.
Offically, the lore is whatever's current in the codex and books. And if it gets retconned, then the newly written thing is what actually happened, but nudge nudge, wink wink, the old thing also still happened. Don't understand what those nudges and winks mean? They'll spell it out for you next month.
Never heard any of this before? Not surprising, in a thread where no one recognized an opened codex before.
Enjoy your mustard brown demi-gods, because joytoy doesn't think they're important enough to look as majestic as they do in the paintings, book covers, game art, box art, video games, animated miniseries, and something every non-retarded fanartist gets right.
If there's any real fans, do you guys think Joytoy will correct their current fuck up for future figures?
