>>9989753>if a toyline sells well that means the proportions and sculpts aren't inaccurate. implied inverse is also truelol. Sure is fanboy logic. BTW, figuart in pic doesn't even have inner elbow or bicep swivel motion. Fucking backwards.
>Hence why the market is moving towards better articulation.As many people found out, it isn't necessarily better. It's just apparently different for hte sake of change. Shit's been talked to ages about this shit.
>What I'm getting at is that the standards for a "great job" are improving all the timeLOL, and do you know how poor that is? IT took them 15 years for them to get to the point other companies were at in the late 90s. Bad sculptors did poor jobs yet fanboys like yourself made excuses after excuse, pretending it isn't even bad, creating shitstorms and developing unhealthy grudges because you needed to defend the brand.
>but not articulated ones. Still no excuse for poor efforts. It's your country not having internet access in the 00s.
>But oh look, the sculpt has had to be compromised at the scale to allow for poseability.That's not how it works. Takara was literally being cheap as fuck and reusing bodies. The fact MLs, GI Joes, McFarlanes, etc didnt have more poseable bodies was because of market conditions (collectors wanting more accurate sculpts/paint) and companies like Toy Biz, Hasbro, and McFarlane still figuring the joints to use. The true market changers in the toy industry. Again, see
>>9989409>But the engineering was so primitive on them that they looked awful.Bandai's engineering is more cmoplex, yet it also looks worse. Rather have two cuts and a ball looking piece vs 523525 cuts and 2-3 ball looking pieces depending on the angle/position of the limbs
>OK coward.>not arguing a retard's inane beliefs is cowardly.. on the same token, i am fighting a retard anyway. But at least the parts I'm responding to just sound like stupid ignorance and not complete fantasy
