>>10943087Just equating you with the retards who think diecast is a valuable substance just because it's heavy.
Competely retarded take to equate heavier plastics as being higher quality or even durable.
And no, i didn't buy any of Bandai's Space Marines, because they really didn't look better than McFarlane's and turned out that they weren't more poseable either.
These threads were pretty great in the beginning, because we had a lot of honest posts from people comparing their toys.
>Robot Damashiis are BETTER than Bandai's WH40K line in every wayWay to show how dishonest you are, considering the RD line has little to no paint, while Bandai is at least giving their WH40k figures shading and woweee, even metallic gold paint.
And earlier posters said they were equal except price. So what changed since?
BTW, i was literally the first person on /toy/ to reveal the facts about diecast and i like to squash any ignorant ideas by constantly reminding people about it, since it took years for the retards to finally accept diecast is shit.
It's a harder to do the same with plastics, because we rarely get info on what plastics they use, muchless the actual formulas they're using. So i can only point toward lines like LEGO using light plastics and withstanding children abusing it or polycarbonate being used for bullet proof glass and CD/DVD/BDs used as frisbees without shattering. ... or pointing to lines using made of heavier plastics being brittle, but i really can't bring these up without inflaming so many buttholes.
