>>7739961>Someone claims something>Other question it, asks for source>The questioner shall search everything for himselfThats not how it works anon. That answer here
>>7739959 was better than what you wrote. Hope it was not you. Both things makes you look retarded.
>>7739960Two years ago was the time the Lego Ninjago the Movie was released. After the Lego Movie and being their biggest inhouse IP it was expected to be big.
So the artist tried to post it and connect it with Ninjago by speculating it inspired Ninjago designs.
But Ninjago the movie bombed, so the hope for fame never came.
To prove further the point that its fanfiction, be it back than or after Ninjago movie was announced:
The artist states that these designs
>>7739453 are from 1998. But one project he has from 1999 says it was a school concept. IMDB has 2005 as earliest entree in his resumee.
That means these sketches were made in art school. Maybe Lego did give a school project pitch to the school, like the 1999 was.
But his social media says he lives in LA, lived San Franscisco and born in Marietta, Georgia. So why would a danish company in 98 give school pitches to america and not london or france?
And why does his company list only 3d models and video games instead of any toys?
The plot around is smells fishy!
Are you Mike, the creator of these designs
>>7739460 ?
You dont need to boost these concepts, they are cool and good as threy are. Dont try to use them in a fishy way. Or make the joke you used on artstation, that somebody at Lego could have seen your ideas and later made similar designs.
