>>10922794>>10922797>>10922803Not to call you a faggot, but you sound like a faggot in these posts.
>It literally has no tracks. Like you say in a later post there's track, but just a display base. If you mean a full loop of track you can either go and use track from some other Lego train set you have or go on ebay and buy a complete circle of track for under $25. Curves are plentiful on the aftermarket since most Lego Train folks are buying the track packs Lego makes for the straights rather than the curves.
>It's too many parts for what it is It has 2760 parts total according to Bricklink, and if we assume the track base, water tower, and windmill use up 500-700 of those parts then that leaves 2000-2200 for the engine, tender, passenger and freight car, which is well within reason for a higher-end non-City train set.
>and is a total dust collector. It's a train set. The assumption is that you throw it onto your train layout or underneath a Christmas tree and run it. And like another anon pointed out, the red train can be easily motorized since there's enough space in the engine and tender to stuff a motor and battery box into both, while there's like no room to power the green train
>It's meant to go on shelves and not be played with. No fun there.I'd go as far to argue that there's more playability with the Red train, since there's actually room to pull off train heists inside the passenger car, not to mention an actually populated box car with a horse and other goods.
And like
>>10922811 pointed out it's really just a knock-off Constitution, especially with the cars using the exact same undercarriage, both engines using the same smokebox door design, and the tender being almost a 1-for-1 ripoff. The buildings in the Wild West set are very nice and if it were just them alone I'd have bought it, but the Train in that set is very much an afterthought to use up as much of the parts count as possible (As evident by coming with 3996/4000 parts.)
>t. Trainfag 