>>10474301>want to pretend McFarlane Toys make shit toys>wants to pretend movie that bombed isn't the reason the toys based on a bomba movie bombed>All other Mcfarlane Toys sell well enough that a small company can afford a major mass market license for one of the most popular brands in the world Sure is retard telling me that 2 < 3 < 2
Your logic is complete shit.
>considered the best Toon Turtlelol, but you just told me that if a line bombs it's because the toys are bad. IT's almost like you're a retarded fanboy picking and choosing what his logic can be applied to.
>Is that why they're still around?Yes, DC Direct is alive and well. They still are a subsidary of WB, almost got canned because ATT has been making major cuts to their-WB subsidary, and are now managed by McFarlane Toys specifically because their products sell well. A small company like McFarlane Toys wouldn't have saved DCD if their all their products sold poorly.
pic another example of your retard logic that you don't want apply it to because you're a retarded fanboy coping hard
And this is going to be my last reponse to this line of cope. Time to move your goalpost, because I'm tired of you trying to argue 2 < 3 < 2
