>>10235639>>10235644>>10235688>>10236119Thanks for all the responses. I don't know if I'm just being paranoid, I mean there are so many people who still buy massive amounts of LEGO. I assume if these quality control issues were THAT bad, there would be a very big controversy about it. I still can't tell just how big of an issue this all is but I feel like the fact that I see so many people posting about brittle/cracked pieces is telling of a bigger problem. It could just be that I'm looking to deeply into a rarer issue, but I feel like maybe it's just not worth getting into LEGO again or at least not right now. I never had or heard of these issues that you hear about now with new LEGO when I was a kid, and honestly if LEGO wasn't so expensive I wouldn't care as much. Maybe I'll give bootleg LEGO a try? IDK
If these quality problems are so persistent, what keeps you guys around?
>>10235650>In my experience it's safest to go for sets/bricks that were made in 2005 or beforeI thought about that, but honestly that just sounds like a real pain in the ass.
