>>9983257>You spent what seems like a dozen posts denying they're fornite guns. Seems like a pretty large point.I don't think I ever intentionally denied they were Fortnite guns, except for maybe one post where I possibly misinterpreted his statement as "they look like they're out of Fortnite". If I did, I apologize, but the basic point- that they look fine alongside DC figures- stands.
>It can't be literal, thus not factual, if it's stylized.Nice reading comprehension and general insanity.
>And only the figure is stylized, but the sculpts on the guns are realistic. One is 50% bigger and the other is roughly accurate to its scale. Again, you make a hypocritical standard by saying execution is what makes something look shit, yet one is and one isn't oversized.The figure as a whole- as a complete package- is stylized. Hence the guns not being accurately scaled. It's not that hard to understand.
>So many hypocritical standards, just like when saying mcFarlane's Halo figures aren't scaledWhich is true, the line's scaling is beyond fucked.
>and insinuating it's bad that one series is bigger than the otherIndividual figures within the same line are out of scale. I don't care that much because I'm not a scale autist but when a figure line has a goal of accurate depictions (unlike Revo Snake) it is notable.
>despite the size difference being less the REvoltech Snakes.Again, the McFarlane Halo line is trying to go for accuracy whilst the Revomini Snake is just trying to look cool. They aim for different things.
But those Sabertooths are stylized too, so are the size differences between the 4" Sabertooth and 7" Sabertoosh slight?
>Something something WolverineThey're intended to go with totally different figure lines. If a different RevoMini aimed to be put directly alongside Snake came with a FAMAS but it was a different size, that would be more or a problem. Sounds to me like you don't understand scale.
>bootleg-quality toy.Ironic, it's better made than McF Halo.
