>>10896438I conceptually would lean towards NECA simply as a manufacturer that would be open to a variety of different characters and not be stuck on simply one IP or license because they hold it. I'm with this anon
>>10896459>using better materials, and putting forethought into articulation and engineeringon that particular aspect - which is definitely present in some NECA toys I both see in person and see on line and haven't bought - and some older toys I have purchased on the secondary market - because I thought they would be interesting characters for photography or fodder, etc., and even at the dirt cheap prices I sometimes get, regret buying because of something as simple as being a NECA figure that doesn't articulate or articulates minimally.
>>10896319I love LEGO even if I don't own any, largely because before I moved I didn't have the space to either store bricks and now that I do have more space, I've spent my energy on articulated figures, because I can play and photograph them by myself and discussing them on-line or over the phone is an option.
With LEGO, I think you do need IRL friends with that interest who also live nearby, two things I lack in my place (have friends, just not toys enthusiasts), for it to make sense as a hobby.
But I would love to work with LEGO. I do think the characters are limited by the brick design and that would be part of my idea, probably.
