>>5744803>You're whiteknighting someone who will never even know you exist. whiteknighting would imply I think she's fine for what she did which I never noted. In my original posted I stated her fame was for stupid shit showing that I do think it's dumb she got fame for that.
>Do you feel the need to "win" at something so desperately that you'll argue such a useless non-issue?At what point did I say there was anything to win? Is that how you see any conversation? A big fight to see who "wins"?
Misinformation was posted, I pointed it out, I was accused of caring, I say I don't, and somehow that leads to this being a competition on who wins a bad thread?
>another wall of textIm guessing you are on a small phone?
>you aren't trying to win anythingWhat is there to win? We both think it's stupid just one of us has this illusion that this is new when it's been around for 2 decades internet wise.
>that you don't care about it anywayI care that this kills time between transits at work