>>5798861Except in the overwhelming majority of human beings the brains develop differently on the basis of sex to appreciate and understand things. It's as diametrically different as phenotypical traits between the sexes. For example spatial awareness is incredibly more accurate in male brains than females (as a femanon you can even take an online spatial awareness test yourself to see) so things that involve construction and abstract mental visualization are naturally much more interesting to males than females. In much the same way, females have developed a much more keen ability to distinguish colors and patterns than males due to common male ocular genetic deficiencies, so things that involve pattern coordination and color choice is much more interesting (and comprehendible) to females than males.
These things aren't "taught" they are hardwired into human physiology, and it translates to how toys are developed and demographically marketed. You wouldn't make a huge market push for construction things or transforming things to females because the interest is going to be quite low by factor of nature. You also wouldn't push color- and pattern-rich play materials to boys because the level of perception is stunted and as such so would be the enjoyment of those toy attributes.
So, no, you are incredibly off target when you say that you should blame parents for anything. Anecdotally maybe you have a differently wired brain that appreciates things closer to a common male, but for the overwhelming majority of human beings you would be the outsider by way of nature, not nurture.
