>>5921621Heh, I thought mentioning MP ramjet was enough, seems a CHEAPER set should of been mentioned.
FYI if you haven't noticed I mentioned I have g2 bruticus which has taken the spot of what would of been the UW, I also have the CW on hand, waiting on hasbro to get moving with their proper blastoff which I doubt, as much as I liked the deco on UW bruticus the cost isn't worth it (and I got the CW set long ago)
>>5921622I actually own CW defensor but between both the deco is meh, all I wanted was to fill the spot my childhood missed out on, which was groove.
>>5921623The fact YOU retards focus on the fact I keep mentioning takara stuff but not knowing all the facts amazes me, so-
>cw bruticus>g2 bruticus>CW victorion>CW optimus maximus>cw defensor (with rook+groove)>cw skylynx (fixed own ratchets, knew of issue before purchase)>entire hasbro mp seekers>hasbro mp bluestreak and prowlI own only those worthy of my attention, between them their qc is up and down (the fucking seekers are progressively getting worse, starscream is my shittest, my acidstorm which I got second hand LOOSE is tighter and more cooperative), same between prowl (almost takara quality on par with my smokescreen aside from hairline misses with tampos but I never noticed those) compared to bluestreak (I should of expected just paint issues but didn't expect loose sprues jamming his transformation.
You fuckers are only seeing this
>TAKARA WINS WOOWhere's I'm trying to say this
>I tried both, I am aware of both being shit one way or anotherOne thing I think we can actually fucking agree on, hasbro is skimping out on paint where characters are barely recognizable save body shape compared to years ago, and while they're made in the same factories we hear LESS of takara's faults, and when we do they ARE INFACT horrible things, but its not like we're getting a majority of figures that could of been better.
>>5921624Well, ok I don't man handle them, I just don't go step by step
