>>6117752>>6117884based on the play features, and/or type of set it is
a car obviously has playability, but a car that cant keep rolling after being pushed (penguins bitchin new pimpmobile) would get a knock
launchers, nearly any moving part, action features, transformations
shit like that all would count realistically. they're all "cool" things that keep a kid playing with it longer.
imo as an adult, you can rate playability, but you should be raiting it with a new scale of "is this feature obtrusive, and does its addition detract from the set"
the new batcave would be an example of bad additions, because nothing is hidden, and nearly all the features are both pointless, and detract from the look, because they're not hidden at all
the NRG dragons wings would be a positive one, while the wings are obviously MADE in such a way that they can fold, and it can rest they could have been designed literally the same way, but without movement, and it would still have looked good
the penguin's car would be neutral. while launchers arent anything new, his are integrated and hidden as headlights, and his trunk opening actually has purpose
tl:dr adults can rate play features, as long as they're less retarded than my wall of text. this is why i do not review
