>>6573009>>6573309If you want some actual criticism, heres a few things.
-Camera's not focusing on the toy when you're showing it off in hand the way you are. Thats why a lot of reviewers use a plain white background (or just a plain background) with nothing else and don't show themselves, because the camera will usually focus on the person otherwise. If I'm watching a review, I'm here to see the toy, to see what it looks like, how it moves, any potential issues, etc.
-Toss in more things about the toy itself. Likes, dislikes, maybe problems you spied on your copy like too loose/too tight bits, etc. Talk about possible issues, if you see something that might be a problem later on, like painted diecast, diecast-on-plastic joints, rubber use, friction on painted areas, etc.
-You sound energetic, and thats good, since a lot of people don't like monotone reviewers, but it is supposed to be a review. Try to point out anything that might be a problem, and highlight whats good. Maybe bullet point it and show it in the review at some point just for a summary towards the end.
-Comparison to similar figures in the line is good. He's a remold of Doublecross, so thats the obvious comparison.
-The lighting you're working in seems alright. Not too bright, not too dim.
-Personal issue, but you might wanna shave a bit. That shit is all over the place, man. You look like a neckbeard. Which means you look like most of /tfg/, and we're not exactly very eye-friendly folks, I'd wager.
