>>7737882How is it better, seriously. One could argue the head is better, but even that is cancelled by all of the facial expression looking off for 2.0
Am I the only one who think 1.0 look objectively better?
Alos, what kind of negative geometry are they using to make 2.0 taller and bigger than 1.0? I'd be tempeted to say "more empty space on the inside", but then it could have been used to store all of his mess of back kibble.
and the feet. Wtf with the feet? Lik, I see the transformation video and how could anyone thought "yes, yes, this is exactly how we should fold it" I am 100% sure there is a way to fold the exact same car panels to make feet look like their chins didn't vomits some extra parts.
A 3rd party could easily come up with just replacement feet and make soemthing better that would be less complex to obtain something still less of a mess than his feet end up looking like.
