>>8128365>huur you can't come up with why a toy moving in more axises is betteryou're retarded.
>Not always. Yeah, but with Brock, he has multiple designs and that's thanks to his artists.
>outright design isn't different Again, missing the point. If you haven't noticed, people have clamored for various builds for Spiderman for years, like McFarlane and Bagley.
Nevermind there are certain people who make fun of Pizza Spiderman because of weird shit going on with his torso and how many times has that mold been reused?
Again, you're defending cheapness.
>your example is literally looking next to the rifle and not down it.It's actually looking down the rifle. It's hard to tell because he has no eyes or other features, but you can the straight line going down his head and the two forward facing rivets.
But you're not against lying just to pretend to have a point, huh? Like saying I'm assuming shit despite reality saying differently, or pretending that having more range of motion isn't needed.
Again, makes you just sound like a troll.
>>8129128Toys aren't perfect. There's not going to be exact, but to get a close approximation like that is what everyone aims for. IT's why i didn't criticize that guy's second photo, because thats good enough. Third photo is OK, nothing technically wrong.
So he's just trolling if he's trying to be anal for my photo and is pretending that that guy's example is somehow better, despite both being equally as good.
And figures being able to do stuff like that is pretty rare (or used to be). This is also why you need to switch out guns, because some guns are extremely difficult to hold realistically, and others are easier to hold
