>>8383360I watched a video of it, specifically
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ATC5OqPpWQ Looks decent enough for <20 bucks. I mean, I've had figuarts before that reminded me of a bootleg (Was very, very rough and dirty. At least AmiAmi replaced it with one that looked a bit better).
>>8383346Had the (dis)pleasure of picking the best looking among some WCT figures recently. They all either had random scratches, plastic whitening (Stress? Also what looked like sand or something), covered in black dots or worse, even chunks of plastic missing. And that was just from looking through the packaging. I get they're made for kids who usually don't give a fuck, but that doesn't excuse them from doing proper QC. One had a good chunk out of his leg.
Was Wave 1 though. They might've got their shit together by now, as I got a W6 one that looks nice.
Bigger expensive names, Figuarts and Figma have noticeably gone down in QC over the years.
Bandai even refused to replace parts that had cracked/chipped paint. Though we all know their support sucks. Better to deal with stores than them directly.
With figma for example, it was rare to get a KonoSuba one that didn't have paint or eyepatch placement issues. At least their support is good. Recently I got a figma that had actual hair in multiple pieces' plastic...
If you just mean with good QC that "Hey this arm moves without breaking", then yeah.
But they could at least look good while doing it.
>>8383396Would you say they're like SHF fleshy arms/necks/flexible hairs?
SS 1.0 Goku's neck is pretty soft.
