>>8754166>Again, that's not the pointThen what is the point? That everything has flaws when examined closely? No shit. The point that myself, and others have been making, is that those flaws are more apparent to the naked eye than the flaws on other figures.
>And what exactly are you trying to say about macro images vs holding a figure up to your face? The effect is mostly the same...I'm implying you assume that these flaws are only apparent in close up macro photography and not when you look at them. I can notice these flaws from inside the packaging. The paint is super inconsistent on these so you really have to pick and choose when you can.
>from a reasonable distance, there aren't things you'd notice, and when you inspect things closely you're more likely to notice the imperfections present.I can still see them with the naked eye whereas it's not as bad on even similarly priced Marvel Legends. Sure they have flaws and inconsistent paint, but not as inconsistent as Mcfarlane toys.
>But anyways, you're getting into what I think is supposed to be some kind of attack with your comments about being "scared of the COVID" and looking at macro images, which is pretty strange.I'm just saying it's apparent that you haven't seen these figures in person and are assuming these flaws are only noticible in macro pictures. If you saw these in person you'd know that these flaws are apparent in person as well.
