>>9329065>It's standard across the toy industryThat's cute how shit your logic is. Is it because you need to try extra retarded to defend Bandai?
Just because a bunch of companies decide to do that doesn't mean it's not inferior.
They're taking away high end features and no matter how hard they try, it's not as good as the real thing. It's a low res substitute.
>You're the one posting an opinion literally none else agrees withYou realize that we have an entire thread about McFarlane's downgrade in paint jobs, right? We also have a thread full of people who like and buy his newest toys too. Seems like many dozens of people like his toys AND also liked how he used to paint his figures. Funny how board is full of many opinions from many different people and not a single person like you're trying to claim
But again, shit logic because you try extra retarded to defend Bandai.
>I never claimed my opion as objectiveYou fail English this wrong?
Let's see what was said
>But compared to other companies' talent, they're definitely not as good. (me)>This is entirely subjective (you)I'm referring to on model toys, with good sculpts and good paint. Why would that be subjective?
Maybe you should reply to another part, instead of directly quoting something that doesn't fit what you're trying to say.
Yes, you can like your janky toy, but i've been talking about talking about talent and sculpt quality. Everything I referenced directly corresponds to objective measurements.
Whereas you needed to switch from talking about Bandai improving (read, using another sculptor who's better at likeness) to talking about how you like jankiness, because you want to avoid talking about the old point.
And no one will deny the fact that a $80 Figuarts has better articulation than a $20 children's toy, but I've constantly referenced Mafex multiple times, which are also better than $20 figures
As i posted earlier: people generally like other companies' figures because they do better jobs.
