>>9696502literally states
>we keep getting these designsAnd then says how WB explains who/what those designs are...
>makes you come off as lazy and stupid.LMAO. So if i called your mom a whore, you sent me a photograph of your mom pleasuring all 7 of your "dads" at once as proof she only loved one man (the one taking her in the butt, because thats how you express real love), and i used that photograph as evidence of your mom is a whore... that makes me lazy and stupid.
Sorry, but your literally proved yourself wrong when linking to that video and proved me right. There's no need for me to provide evidence, because you proved me right.
There should be no argument, yet here you are, ignoring the words he said, the explanation on the selection process, and now requiring me to provide a second source because apparently something is only true if it's said twice?
Might as well tell me i need to provide 10 other sources, and not from McFarlane, because he talks funny.
>this has to be some kind of projection.Nah, because i really question your ability to comprehend English, because you're literally ignoring simple English. If you're not some ESL, could you be deaf? Seems like i attract a lot of cripples because i know a lot of my haters actually have shit eyesight.
