>>34261170>a basic shit plot still beats a basic shit plot full of plotholeslmao their you go with your bargaining phase again.
Black and White 2s plot is dog shit. USUMs plot is fine. If you think settling for a pile of shit is better because it's different then that alone speaks volumes about your non existent taste for quality content.
>and ignore everything bw2 does betterNo such things exist. Meanwhile sales and reviews do. Sorry sweetheart, you lose again.
>>34261175>lmao switching one pokemon out for another is a significant addition now?Yes. I was lukewarm about the totem system in the first game because the majority of them were a joke that weren't thought out very well. USUM fixed that though. They could have just kept the same shit too but they mixed it up where it needed to be. Stellar change, gamefreak does it again.
>In that case you must be the kind of faggot who buys both versions.I haven't bought a pokemon game period lmao. I've either emulated them or pirated them, cuck boy.
>I guess you're just bad at the game, the difficulty was roughly similar to S/M, and that's hardly something that would be marketed anywayNot at all, the difficulty is significantly bigger which is why we have daily threads about Araquanid, Lurantis, Marowak, Mimikyu, Ribombee, Ultra Necrozma etc wiping teams. Hell we even had one yesterday about some guy getting wrecked by Hala, who is also stronger this time around.
Every single trainer who needed to be tough is tougher. Period.
>Thoroughly addressed in the marketing.No, showing an image of the legendaries running through the wormhole told us nothing about what that entailed. Learn what the definition of thoroughly means.
>If by "quality sidequests" you mean shitty fetch quests with pointless rewards that can mostly be bought cheaply anyway then sure.No I mean quality side quests. You're mistaking gen 5 sidequests with gen 7s.
>Was revealed already to anyone paying attention.An eye on a box isn't a reveal.
Next?
