>>39925697>And again whats the point? It'd just be a still like the dozens of stills ON THE BLUESTACKS WEBPAGE. It'd speak nothing of performance so why bother. Webm related. it doesnt work.
>Which is why I"m not going to bother making a video either, just download the demo it takes like 10 seconds unless you're on dial upyou have to download, install it, and go through the long first boot process which i didnt want to do
>>39925742>>39925731i know this is bait, but this webm should be saved and replayed for anyone who wants to shitpost and say you can emulate it.
