>>39572649>i don't want to start another autistic """argument""" Calling it autistic and implying it wasn't an argument doesn't invalidate anything I said. Even if you say that comedic effect you do it in a manner that still makes it come off as an ad-hom
>but when it comes to furshit the main defining factor is the bodyNo shit, what do you think I've been focusing on.
>"anthromorphisation" is a pretty retarded and open term, applying human traits to animals is human natureNo shit what do you think my initial posts were saying when referring to the fact they turned furfrou into a porn star
>putting a hat on a dog doesn't make it not zoophiliaTrue but.... relevance?
