>>39572988>Not the person you were arguing with but it's a good thing Pokemon aren't reptiles, they're PokemonPokemon can be reptiles anon and birds, and mammals, and machines, ect. The game, anime, movie including live action and manga all say as such. Your notion is invalid.
>You can draw all the busty feral pictures you want of them and they'll still be monsters that fit in your pocket. No they are not, you have turned them into something perverse, something other then what you started with.
>That sounds more like Gijinka than anthro imo, where its very much human with pokemon features/looks than a Pokemon with human-like features.Gijinka and anthropomorphism are the exact same thing anon, you are giving human attributes to a non-human thing. The only difference really is the word
>Damn, those breasts physics. More?Sorry all I got, I only have that one to post mostly a joke as it looks vague like she doesn't like her new assets. Got some braixen and Blaziken and lucaro they are all flat chested and basically on model and would very much get me banned.
>you can't even see the whole body.You don't have to. Shes standing up holding a position that is very human while wearing human close giving an expression that is human ie smiling as Foxes can't really smile.
> If you give a feral curves and titties, thats also anthro, there's obviously exceptions for everything but those are the general rules.>udontsay.jpgI'm more concern with stuff like Furfrou anon where they've been anthropomorphized to the point they are human with residual Pokemon features ie nolonger remotely what you started with.
Any don't worry about me going on about this today, I got an 10 hour shift today so this will be my say on it until about 6pm
