>>46519234>I already disavowed using the word worshipWell, disavow the other 3 words I added on there as well, along with dogmatically believe, and then you'll be arguing honestly. Talk about picking and choosing.
>Speaking in weird vague half-arguments>Give me the entire body of scientific knowledge and historical understanding in this basket-weaving forum or the Gardevoir gets it!At this point, mate, there's not much to agree on. Just search it up. Ain't writing ya a novel.
>that Santa's 'creation' and the beliefs toward SantaThe argument was and has always been about whether or not they exist, NOT the "specifics" of how they were invented. Their origin being the exact same is ENTIRELY irrelevant as to whether they exist or not. THIS is what I mean when I say they are similar. Similar in every way anyone normally uses to differentiate something that exists from something that doesn't. Do you need to know Lewis Carrol invented the Jabberwocky to know it's not real? Of course not.
>Are you ESL?Bruh, I'm a Linguist and an English teacher. There is no error in that sentence, save for the comma splice in between "ect." and "stop." Want me to grammar Nazi your writing? 'Cause I do that for a living.
Ok. I'll find you a wojak. I don't have many, but since you insist, here it is. 'Night.
>>46519296>Thread about Umineko>Not discussing religionDisdain for plebs
