>>56729673The phrase “attraction to animals is bad” is as correct and mundane as saying “water is wet” and “sun is hot”, and yet, you guys take offense by it. There’s no “counter” argument here other than genuine degeneracy.
>sapienceAddressed by the fact that Pokemon don’t have intelligence or cultures of their own, therefore, they don’t have sapience.
>slaveryAddressed by the fact they’re akin to labor animals, therefore, it’s not slavery to catch pokemon.
>affectionAddressed by the fact that Pokemon have the same status as pets, as they eat dog food and sleep in pet food, therefore, attraction towards Pokemon is akin to being attracted to your pet and cannot return your twisted “affection”.
>>56729702See:
>>56727994 