>>48005026>So iterative sequels don't exist anymore in your tiny mind? Okay then. Even though I called the games practically the same for 25 years, you still really wouldn't get the same experience playing Gen 8 as you did Gen 1. This will be the same exact way, the core will stay the same, but more can be added on.So you're just twisting the conversation to suit whatever you're arguing over at the time, nice job showing how much of a disingenuous cunt you are. This'll be my last reply, but I'll humor you anyways.
>Yes, bitch. Like I said, it would make absolutely 0 sense.lol, hilarious that you try to add "bitch" as if that means anything. GF stopped caring about sense years ago, what a meaningless argument. They'll do as little as they can get away with and if that means cutting trainer battles, they'll be happy to do so. And TPC would no longer after to arrange VGC.
>The dex in Legends is frames entirely differently. They talk as if you're the first one to document these species so personally before, whereas the Pokedex is clearly not the first time any of these species are documented.It's hardly any different, the Pokedex has always been framed as if Pokemon data had never been compiled into a single ubiquitous source. The implication has always been that the player was gathering data, only it was streamlined to the simple act of catching due to limitations. This is a minor expansion to that, what amounts to little more than busywork to pad out the game that has no trainers to battle. It's so obvious.
>Why?Because I've been following Pokemon marketing for well over a decade and literally every release so far has been very forthcoming with features in pre-release marketing. If they show no trainer battles before release then it's 99.9% likely there are none.
>Then go play any other fucking game in the seriesI can do that and still criticize PLA.
>reddit spacinglol
