>>44629563the strawman you've constructed is in fact wrong. wins and losses aren't black and white. my point however is if you lose to someone that person is better than you and anyone beneath you. you have yet to argue against that point because you can't defeat it.
I'll try to make it simple for you.
Ash beats alola league thus
Ash>alola league
Bea beats Ash thus
Thus
Bea>Ash>alola league
thus
Bea>>alola league
thus
Alola league champion Bea!
brock lesnar or the olympics or wherever you're clumsily moving the goal post is irrelevant If you can't dispute my actual points then my points stand.
>>44629573I mean yeah, I noticed a point I missed so I added it. Never claimed it was from a different person. now back to the point you have yet to defeat
Alola league champion Bea!
