>>56019791Probably what
>>56019817 and
>>56020099 said.
>pointing out that Akari’s age doesn’t matter because she is just my self insert doesn’t always workI'd probably still point it out, personally. Could be something some haven't considered until that point. And I like to drive home that there's more than just one reason to enjoy such fiction. That also serves as a reminder that it's just that - fiction.
Then immediately block if they continue to be obnoxious about it
>>56019837>I guess you could have your own version of them aged upThat doesn't work for everyone... Personally, it wouldn't work for me because the taboo/forbidden/straight up illegal aspects of age gap ships like VoloKari are part of the fun. The power dynamic and imbalanced life experiences are part of the fun... Not sure if that's a good comparison but it's like taking the yandere out of ships with yandere characters. It's another thing that's quite fucked IRL but for some people just the right kind of spice in a fictional ship, self insert or otherwise. Basically, you'd just punish yourself by dulling your fun to appease some weirdos online.
>but even that, some look at it weirdlySpeaking of - this is the kind of user that deserves to be blocked on sight, don't even engage.
The character is aged up at that point. Frontal lobe either fully developed or almost there. Got the kind of life experience you only get by living to that age. Literally ticks every box of "adult". What is still not okay there?
I've read the argument that
>it's a design from a canonical child character, so you're still sexualizing a child!!!!and it's not a very good argument at all. Sounds like the kind of chronically online retard who looks at adult woman wearing "minor coded" outfits and throws shit fits about that. Not worth anyone's time or breath - could be used to find/view/create husbando content instead!