>>54436563yes, flooded with kantomon
>Brawlyall hoennmon in RS, 2 out of 3 in emerald
>Wattson2 hoennmon out of 4 in emerald
>Flannery3 hoennmon out of 4 in emerald, 2 johtomon in RS
>Normanall hoennmon in every version
>winonaall hoennmon except for skarmory (johtomon) in every version
>twinsall hoennmon in every version minus xatu (johtomon) in emerald
>Wallace4 out of 5 hoennmon
>Juan 4 out of 5 hoennmon
flooded! So a false statement right out of the gate.
I view two rivals as different from kanto, you're shifting goalposts now.
Johto does not have its own identity while kanto and hoenn do, that's the point. No one would have cared about johto if you couldn't visit kanto again.
>Muh more waterthe island routes are different, and they give hoenn a clear identity. Name a kanto or johto route similar in style to hoenn's route 119, 113 or upper 115.
The optional areas are laid out differently. Repeating myself once again.
>it was inevitable that [headcanon]not an argument. It's different from gen 1.
Kalos has nothing to do with an argument linked to the first three gens
>By selling less than Gold and Silver?Bad faith argument since we're not talking about sales but still, yes. Gold and Silver simply piggybacked off gen 1's success, RS and the other games allowed pokemon to keep expanding
>After Gold and Silver came out, it was a huge hit around the world, but shortly after everyone was saying, ‘That’s it. The Pokémon fad is over! It’s dead!’ >At the time, the atmosphere and general thinking was that the Pokémon fad was over and there was huge pressure to prove people wrong. The next time I visited it was all Star Wars. Everyone was saying it was on a downtrend>We at Game Freak took that as a challenge and said, ‘It’s not dead. We’re going to show you guys you’re wrong!’ The day of release, I went into the local shop and saw people lining up to buy it and was extremely relievedFrom Masuda
