>>50335111>The problem is that you assume real animals have to existWhoa, I didn't assume any of that, you made that up. If we're going over it though, then I'm just saying if they really want to go the route of removing mention of real animals like in the Indian elephant example, they could've tried harder. Honestly the fact they only removed that one instance but left plenty others doesn't really prove anything. Why not remove India and keep elephant? There are elephant Pokemon and according to you, that'd make perfect sense. But they didn't. See how inconsistent that is if we're going by that logic?
Pokemon is not a complex world with complex rules, it's a series for children that gets lazier with each generation. No point in trying to find the abyssal depths of a shallow puddle.
